Dear OM [Dutch Prosecution Office],
The remarkably swift arrest of Jeroenz0r, a 16 year old Dutch student, has been all over the international media since the event took place. While the Kremlin takes a dig at the U.S. over Assange’s arrest, while Facebook and Twitter delete the accounts of cyber activists, while over 9,000 ‘hacktivists’ are believed to be behind electronic onslaught, the Dutch authorities arrest a 16-year-old boy
suspected of involvement with Operation Payback.
The whole world reports about WikiLeaks and Operation Payback. How could an underage boy be held responsible for making the world wide news? How could the Dutch authorities hold a 16 year old boy responsible for the world being in a state of digital war?
Is it in the haste of getting something done, that the Dutch government labeled him as a scapegoat and a terrorist, just so they could say: “We have done our part about the cyber terrorists”? Is the detention and possible conviction of Jeroenz0r an act by law,
or is it –as we suspect– a political statement? Is Jeroenz0r being used to scare the
hell out of everybody who would think that they could do something about censorship and the forces our governments (ab)use?
If this would be a fair trial, what evidence would there be? He may have been a user, or even host for an IRC server, still, this may hopefully not be the primary reason? Even if he had an active role in coordinating the attacks on MasterCard and Visa, which is still improbable, Anonymous is not a personal army and will not be commanded like one. How then, would that incriminate him if everybody is responsible for his/her own deeds? One student would never be powerful enough to take down corporations like MasterCard, Visa or Paypal.
Could we accept that in todays’ society, big corporations are using children as a means of manipulating people for their own gain and benefit? What could have happened if the government had decided to stick out for freedom of expression and free speech, and refused to bend under the demands of MasterCard and Visa? It could have turned out to be a turning point in the war between big corporations and the people who get caught in the gears of the system and have no means of making their way out from the mess.
Eventually, even the government will have to decide, either to be the puppet in the hands of global corporations, or be the one who paved way for rebellion against oppressive corporations and corruption of our society.
We would like Jeroenz0r to know that Anonymous will not be giving up on him. One for all, all for one. Divided by zero.
Signed:
10.12.2010
Failship IRC team
Anonboots, Bnon, (Jeroenz0r), Kris, Paws, Zeekill
Seriously, this #jeroenz0r crap has to stop, he is no hacker, he just used a retarded tool called loic, DDoS =/= hacking
On 12-12-2010 04:09:33, sinenV wrote:
Finally, some dipshit got caught. DDoS =/= hacking is correct. And attacking the sites of companies that decided not to support Wikileaks is fucjking retarded. While /b/ there is having a shitstorm about that and being hypocrites on their goal, they could be using their resources on something more useful. Westboro Baptist Church out on Kansas deserves a DDoS than fucking visa.com especially since they put out a hateful message. But that's beside the point; many people on the net are fucking retarded and only do things that they seem is right when in hindsight, what they're doing is counterintuitive and hypocritical to their goal. I mean, stopping access to websites to promote freedom? Freaking retards.
On 12-12-2010 04:09:33, sinenV wrote:
Westboro Baptist Church out on Kansas deserves a DDoS than fucking visa.com especially since they put out a hateful message.
On 12-12-2010 15:37:20, Vogelhuisje wrote:
Knomo is going downnn
On 12-12-2010 15:01:02, Morango wrote:
[...]
whats happening there?
On 12-12-2010 17:47:23, Daan wrote:
Did you read your own post?
50% of it makes no sense at all.
On 12-12-2010 15:37:20, Vogelhuisje wrote:
Knomo is going downnn
What is real?
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/213120/dutch_arrest_16yearold_related_to_wikileaks_attacks.html