JurneSleddens [Set Editor] -
JurneSleddens [Set Editor] -
What do you you think. Should we still add the artist of the interview as artist of the set? Because (most of the time) the artist of the interview does not play the set.
On 12-11-2022 22:55:45, JurneSleddens wrote:
What do you you think. Should we still add the artist of the interview as artist of the set? Because (most of the time) the artist of the interview does not play the set.
Let's remove it from the title and mention it in the more info section ..it could be misleading in a way. Do you agree?
JurneSleddens [Set Editor] -
On 12-11-2022 23:32:07, hardcorerepublic wrote:
On 12-11-2022 22:55:45, JurneSleddens wrote:
What do you you think. Should we still add the artist of the interview as artist of the set? Because (most of the time) the artist of the interview does not play the set.
Let's remove it from the title and mention it in the more info section ..it could be misleading in a way. Do you agree?
That's a good solution (:
On 13-11-2022 08:44:55, JurneSleddens wrote:
On 12-11-2022 23:32:07, hardcorerepublic wrote:
On 12-11-2022 22:55:45, JurneSleddens wrote:
What do you you think. Should we still add the artist of the interview as artist of the set? Because (most of the time) the artist of the interview does not play the set.
Let's remove it from the title and mention it in the more info section ..it could be misleading in a way. Do you agree?
That's a good solution (:
Thanks for pointing it out, i was not paying attention
