Feedback / new lsdb derivative

On 25-04-2010 15:39:29, Star wrote:

Great idea as long as the top10 also shows amateurs in the pro version :P so i don't have to switch back if there's a good amateur set

good amateur sets are from me

On 25-04-2010 15:56:14, greg4850 wrote:

[...]

good amateur sets are from me

you have to work your skillz

On 25-04-2010 16:23:18, alexvdh wrote:

[...]

you have to work your skillz

i know but its much better than at my beginning here

On 25-04-2010 16:24:52, greg4850 wrote:

[...]

i know but its much better than at my beginning here

lol I remember "G-Noize @ first mix",your TL was already sweet

On 25-04-2010 16:26:29, alexvdh wrote:

[...]

lol I remember "G-Noize @ first mix",your TL was already sweet

a lot of people say that I allways have nice Tracklists

So how is you are deciding the the divide between professional and ametuer?

Radio broadcasts to be professional?

I think the line should be drawn wether the artist has a release or not

On 25-04-2010 17:08:44, Pithune wrote:

I think the line should be drawn wether the artist has a release or not

On 25-04-2010 17:08:44, Pithune wrote:

I think the line should be drawn wether the artist has a release or not

fuckin idd

Read the first post.

On 25-04-2010 17:10:20, djdesudo wrote:

[...]

Dj's without any release are considered to be amateur no matter how good they are, since they only play tracks from other people in their sets.

-edit-

and if they play their own tracks, then a release should prove they can do something with music c.q. 'professionalism'

On 25-04-2010 17:08:44, Pithune wrote:

I think the line should be drawn wether the artist has a release or not

The only fucking reason you want that, is for not considering you as a amateur on lsdb.

On 25-04-2010 17:24:05, Dakpan wrote:

[...]

The only fucking reason you want that, is for not considering you as a amateur on lsdb.

I have all the right to, because I've show my professionalism with 1 release.
This however, says nothing about the quality itself* or progress of the artist itself.

*comparing with bigstars playing on all mainstages of big events.

On 25-04-2010 17:28:18, Pithune wrote:

[...]
I have all the right to, because I've show my professionalism with 1 release.
This however, says nothing about the quality itself* or progress of the artist itself.

*comparing with bigstars playing on all mainstages of big events.

Then you have to question the record label its released on. My mate owns his own record label and he's a fucking liability. One of the worst dj's ive heard, tunes are wank and he makes fuck all money from it.

If you have 1 release it doesn't (have to) mean DJ-ing is your primary profession.

On 25-04-2010 17:11:47, Pithune wrote:

[...]
Dj's without any release are considered to be amateur no matter how good they are, since they only play tracks from other people in their sets.

-edit-

and if they play their own tracks, then a release should prove they can do something with music c.q. 'professionalism'

The biggest retards can release on a label. Nothing professional about it.

On 25-04-2010 17:38:14, Dakpan wrote:

[...]

The biggest retards can release on a label. Nothing professional about it.

x2

This whole idea throws up more problems than its worth. but, if its going to stop people having a wee cry because they have to look through a few extra sets then banging. You'll probably notice that there isnt the number of ametuer sets you think there would be anyway.

How 'bout changing the (Professional) symbol to ":showtek:"
-_-

On 25-04-2010 17:46:01, loser wrote:

How 'bout changing the (Professional) symbol to ":showtek:"
-_-

On 25-04-2010 17:35:40, mstx wrote:

If you have 1 release it doesn't (have to) mean DJ-ing is your primary profession.

Yeah i think like 10 bookings is good enough to be a pro dj and they have to be active though